Collage and montage are
quintessential techniques in modern and contemporary art
and filmmaking. Collage
combines pictorial motifs and fragments from disconnected
origins into a new
synthetic entity which casts new roles and meanings to the parts. It
suggests new
narratives, dialogues, juxtapositions and temporal durations. Its elements lead
double-lives; the collaged ingredients are suspended between their originary essences
and the new roles assigned to them by the poetic ensemble.
The techniques of
collage and assemblage are conventionally related to
visual arts and cinema,
but Joseph Brodsky, the poet, makes the remark: “It was
poetry that invented
the technique of montage, not Eisenstein”.1 However, every
artistic work, be it
literary, musical or visual, is bound to be a juxtaposition of
images, emotions and
ambiences in order to construct an articulated and engaging
spatio-temporal experience.
Whether the work qualifies as a collage depends
on the degree of the
apparent “givenness” of its ingredients. We tend to think that
our awareness is a
coherent and continuous mental state. In fact, human consciousness keeps
shifting from one percept and thought to the next, from actuality to dream,
association to deduction, and from recollection to imagination. Our very
consciousness is an
ever-changing collage of mental fragments held together by one’s
sense of self.
In its inherent
permanence and penetrating, preconceived order, the art
form of architecture is
conventionally not associated with the notion of collage. Yet,
the very role of
architecture as frames and settings for human activities turns it into a
varying and variously
completed entity, an ever-changing collage of activities, furnishings and
objects. Because of their longevity, buildings tend to change their functions and
be altered as material entities. Most of our historical buildings are
assemblies of alterations, materials, textures and colours layered through
decades or centuries of use.
Often it is this very
temporal layering that gives a building its unique atmosphere and
charm; the geometric
spatial and material configuration of architecture is embraced
and enhanced by use,
erosion and time; architecture turns from a spatial abstraction
into a lived situation,
ambience and metaphor.
The idea of collage has
also been a conscious and deliberate artistic method
in architecture from
Giulio Romano’s Palazzo Te in Mantua to Le Corbusier’s and
Alvar Aalto’s fusions
of modernist and vernacular images in their architectural assemblages, all the
way to Jean Nouvel’s collaged walls of the Belfort Theatre and David Chipperfield’s
renovation of Neues Museum in Berlin. Also, many of Frank Gehry’s works are
collages although even the parts are deliberately designed by the architect; nevertheless,
his buildings appear as assemblages of pre-existing units suggestive of differing
origins.
Contemporary buildings,
such as art museums, often appear strained and
severe in their
relentless formal logic, whereas the same activities located in recycled
buildings – frequently
of former industrial use – project a more relaxed and welcoming
atmosphere due to their
more complex logic, confl icting architectural themes and richer materiality;
indeed, their collage-character. Peter Brook, the radical theatre
director, deliberately
demolished his avant-garde theatre building Bouffes du Nord in
Paris in order to
create an associative and emotionally responsive space for theatrical
performances. “A good
space can’t be neutral, for an impersonal sterility gives no food
to the imagination. The
Bouffes has the magic and poetry of a ruin, and anyone who
allowed themselves to
be invaded by the atmosphere of a ruin knows strongly how the
imagination is let
loose”, Brook argues.
All collages tend to
have a similar capacity to stimulate our imagination,
as if the various
fragments, torn from their initial settings, would beg the viewer to
give them back their
lost identity. The superbly executed collages by the Czech poet
and artist Jiři Kolař
are suspended between a literary and visual expression, and one
can almost hear words
being whispered by the visual imagery. Leonardo advised artists to stare at a
crumbling wall in order to enter the mental state of inspiration,3 and the collage
takes similar advantage of the intricacies of our perceptual, imaginative and empathetic
processes.
Notes
1 Joseph Brodsky,
“Wooing the Inanimate”, On Grief and Reason, Farrar, Straus and
Giroux, New York, 1995,
343.
2 Andrew Todd and
Jean-Guy Lecat, The Open Circle: Peter Brook’s Theatre
Environments, Palgrave
MacMillan, New York, 2003, 25.
3 “When you look at a
wall spotted with stains, or with a mixture of stones, if you
have to devise some
scene you may discover a resemblance to various landscapes . . .or, again, you
may see battles and figures in action, or strange faces and costumes, or an
endless variety of objects, which you could reduce to complete and well-drawn
forms. And these appear
on such walls promiscuously, like the sound of bells in
whose jangle you may find
any name or word you choose to imagine.”
As quoted in Robert
Hughes, The Shock of the New – Art and the
Century of Change, Thames
and Hudson, London, 1980, 225.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.